ITEM: New Jersey Governor
Chris Christie conditionally vetoes an online poker bill which was his way of
saying “make these changes and I’ll sign.”
According to the PPA (Poker Players Alliance), “The governor’s
conditional veto openly declared support for licensed online poker and merely
seeks specific modifications on its implementation.”
ITEM: Delaware, Iowa,
and Washington are also moving forward with their own in-state online poker
legislation. Nevada is currently the
only state with laws on the books and licensed vendors, though no sites are yet
up and running, although several are expected to begin operation this year.
ITEM: Zynga launches
a new multi-table tournament module for their Facebook poker users, and it quickly
gains traction. Although only a social
gaming site, Zynga has shown interest in making the jump to real-money games.
ITEM: PokerStars
launches a Zynga-like social poker game on Facebook.
ITEM: Two companies
that would benefit from NJ online gaming, Zynga and Boyd Gaming, have seen
stock prices rise dramatically in the last few weeks.
ITEM: PokerStars is
looking to buy a casino, the Atlantic Club, in Atlantic City, NJ.
ITEM: Hollywood
Casino in Columbus, OH, is adding 6 poker tables…and removing 500 slot machines
to make room.
So does this mean that we still have a seeming insatiable appetite
for poker? I would say yes. And are all the players involved doing
everything they can to help feed that appetite?
Yes, all but one…the Federal Government.
The fact that the PPA has moved away from any
federal lobbying and has concentrated their efforts to the states should be
enough evidence that no one in Washington is paying attention (I realize that
this is said a lot in a variety of issues).
I still think it will be difficult to have an effective poker presence
in the U.S. going state-by-state, but it could be that the Feds will wash their
hands in order to let some progress be made (see horse racing and simulcasting).
I am very hopeful that online poker will become “legal” in
the U.S. once again (of course, it’s not currently illegal, but the moving of
money in order to do so is the crux of the issue – see UIGEA).
I’d love to see more progress sooner than later, but that’s
wishful thinking. But a boy can dream, can’t
he?
No comments:
Post a Comment