To be clear, I am not making reference to the Lincoln
Douglas debates, as those were infamous historical political talks between two
great speakers and political leaders. I
am referring to former political leaders Blanche Lincoln and George Pataki, who
are actually on the same side of the issue in question, both being co-chairs
for Sheldon Adelson’s Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling. And they didn’t debate each other, but were
guests within a week on various conservative talk programs – Lincoln with Mike
Huckabee on Fox TV, and Pataki with Michael Medved on his syndicated radio
program, to talk about RAWA (Restore America’s Wire Act) and “the evils of
online gambling.”
The debate is in how the CSIG decided to deal with the
aftermath of each event, as it is very different indeed.
Lincoln’s appearance on Huckabee last Sunday (11/23) is
pretty much known to all who read this blog, as is the blowback from the Poker
Advocacy community (here,
here,
and here). It was six minutes of drivel from a paid
Adelson shill hosted by a guy who WANTS to be a paid Adelson shill. Fear-mongering? Lots.
Fact free? You bet. And it remains prominent on CSIG’s Facebook
page and YouTube catalog, though it’s not as prominent as it was on their
website (ever since we started to make fun of it).
Pataki’s participation on Hour Two of Medved’s show on 11/14
is…pretty much nowhere. There was as
much build up for it on CSIG’s Facebook page as with Lincoln’s TV appearance. During Medved’s radio show they invited folks
to call in and ask questions. I mean
CSIG did this via Facebook
and Twitter, as this was the show’s format (we’re talking talk radio here
folks). And after the show…CSIG posted
the old
video ad of Pataki blasting “legalized online gambling” (yeah, that’s what
he called it). No mention of the radio
appearance. No podcast on Medved’s
website that I can find. Nada. Zilch.
Why the difference?
Even though I didn’t hear Pataki, I can guess why.
His performance wasn’t the propaganda extravaganza that
Lincoln/Huckabee was. For one thing, it
was radio, and that’s not as flashy as TV.
Second, it was a Q&A, and my guess is that there weren’t enough
strong supporting statements to make into something they could re-bleat…I mean,
repeat. Perhaps there were some
listeners critical of Pataki’s anti-online-gambling stance (many Libertarians
listen to Medved and many are appalled at the anti-states-rights position
RAWA’s supporters take).
Hey, maybe they just erased all the tapes ala Rose Mary
Woods.
On the other hand, Lincoln’s six minutes with Huckabee is EXACTLY
what CSIG wants. It’s propaganda they
way they like to do it. It had
everything – children in peril, families hurt, organized crime and money
laundering, and Lincoln mentioned “the economy” at least once each minute. It had a host who might have been even MORE
adamant about people getting on board this issue (Huckabee said that anyone in
Congress who wasn’t a supporter should be thrown out of office – nice). And there was no Q&A, or any challenge to
any of the statements – just “rah rah rah” from Huckabee.
I watched Lincoln LIVE on the Huckabee program because I feared
they’d do the same thing to her appearance as they did Pataki, and I wanted to
see just what blather they were spreading (having been out of town when Pataki
took to the airwaves). I did a quick
review about five minutes after it aired, and considered drafting a letter to
Lincoln asking her to substantiate all of the claims she made on the program,
starting with the “How big is this Internet Gaming with kids? – IT’S HUGE” declaration. After all, if you know it’s huge, you should
know what percentage of players online are minors, and how many families have
had their credit cards stolen by their kids for this purpose, etc.
Unless you’re making it up, of course.
Once they posted the show clip on YouTube, I even started a
transcription of the show so I could quote her, word for word, but stopped
after a minute or so (I have it below so you can read just how bad it
was). She really was breathlessly going
on from topic to topic, trying to ensure that every potential bad evil horrible
thing CSIG has ever considered got aired.
It was nauseating to try to keep up with the babble.
That’s why I was so very glad to see Nolan Dalla make his Open
Challenge to Blanche Lincoln and the CSIG to a “real public debate” of the issue. For starters,
he’s got far more real poker chops than I (we’re both opinionated older guys,
but that’s where the comparison ends, as people actually listen to him – and
buy him drinks). For another, he knows
far more about both poker AND the folks on both OUR side and the other side of
the issue. If anyone could negotiate a
real, fair debate on the issues of Internet Gaming, it’s Nolan. But, like Nolan, I fear it’ll never
happen, and for the same reasons he mentioned.
Sheldon and CSIG doesn’t want a debate.
Hell, they really don’t want a discussion at all unless they’ve got
control of it.
Think about what happened this past year
at actual government hearings about online gambling. Anytime reps from Sheldon’s group made an
appearance, it was embarrassing (for them) at best, with most of their comments
frightfully unknowledgeable about the very issue they sought to ban. They don’t know how things really work, and don’t
care. They’ve made up their minds, facts
be damned.
And that’s why they had their ass
handled to them in these discussions, and why they never wish to debate.
Bet on it.
BONUS: In case you missed it, Senator Lincoln was
wearing the same outfit on the Huckabee program
as she did in the CSIG ad she did a week before the show posted here. They don’t miss a trick, do they?
BONUS TWO: The transcript of the first minute or so of her spot on Huckabee:
HUCKABEE: How big is this Internet Gaming with kids?LINCOLN: It’s huge, and it’s bad for our kids, it’s bad for our families, and it’s bad for our economy. Because it’s the marginalized…it’s the kids who don’t know what they are doing. Y’know, kids have been playing video games forever. Y’know my boys, my husband Steve and I, we worked hard to follow the guidelines for age-appropriate games, but the fact is they’re used to doing this, and so when they get on they don’t realize it sometimes, um, then, all of the sudden they grab a parent’s phone, they get into it, the credit card. There was a kid that, uh, a single Mom, he stole two of her credit cards, y’know, in a nano-second. Twenty thousand dollars worth of debt on a credit card. I mean, that’s destroying our families, and opportunities that our kids might have, and we gotta do something about it.