Hey you kids - get off my casino! |
I’m
serious. Years ago, I used to work in a
retirement home. I got to see my share
of individuals who were lucid one moment, and then “kinda goofy” the next. Sometimes they’d be upbeat and positive and
speak in complete sentences, and other times they’d babble, not really able to
collect their thoughts even if you gave them a basket.
Two recent
Adelson spots on Bloomberg (here
and here)
give rise to my thoughts that serious senility is kicking in. We in the poker-activist community consider
him dangerous because he has a buttload of money (he’s 8th richest person in
the WORLD according to Forbes). I say he’s also dangerous because of his
ideas (and his money). Speaking of money, Senator Harry
Reid defended
Adelson today, saying that it’s not about the money, but, “He's in it because he has certain
ideological views."
And those
views are nuts. Take this
statement from Shelly:
“There’s no compelling reason to put a casino in everybody’s
pocket.”
WTF? What does
that even mean? Does one NEED a reason? Is that really for HIM to say? And then he follows up that statement with
this:
”[You have] under-age, of age, college students that owe
plenty of money, unfortunate people, working-class people, middle-class people
that will be easily exploited by, and easily incentivized to go on the internet
and gamble. For what?”
Again…what
the hell does that even mean? I interpret
this (and some other things he said) to mean he only wants to make money off
people who can afford to gamble. Just
like he’s doing now. Oh, here he is,
explaining…
”I want to make money from people that can afford it. I can't tell over the internet who is
underage. I can't tell who had financial
difficulties. I can't tell who is gaming
responsibly. I can't tell is money is
being laundered. I CAN in the casinos.”
Sure. I remember being stopped at the door of the
Venetian, where they did a credit check on me (because I looked middle-class,
which I am…barely). I must have passed
muster, because I went into the casino where I found no clocks and free drinks,
and offers to join their “Club Grazie Players Club.” Incentives and exploitation are OK if you can
afford it, of course. Though I never did
find out what the “For what?” was here.
OK, enough
sarcasm. Obviously Shelly doesn't follow
his own advice, which makes him a hypocrite, but we all already knew that. When he talks about his online ban battle, he
just sounds like someone trying to throw everything on the wall, hoping that something
sticks. So far, the “money laundering”
aspect has been shot full of holes, and the “underage gambling” issue is mostly
moot, so, what else does he have?
Money.
The Washington
Post noted that he’s already going into the individual states to buy
politicians do battle. There are
three very populous states that may move forward in the near future - California
(likely), Pennsylvania (maybe - looking better), and New York (meh). Here is where the battle for online poker
will be won or lost.
Betty White
is older than Sheldon, and she has it together far better than he:
Keep up the
fight - don’t let a senile old man beat us!
As always, Mike, an excellent piece! Keep up the fight!
ReplyDelete