In 2014, no less.
I bring this up because my little town of Seaside is once
again hosting the state’s Adolescent
Sexuality Conference (this year’s theme: Building Blocks of Youth Sexual
Health). It’s
been going on since the late Seventies, and this year there was something new
added – a protest.
I was downtown on an errand when I saw the protesters form their picket
line. It was early, before the
conference started, and there were dozens of cars parked at the OTHER end of
the parking lot (next to the Catholic Church…coincidence?). Although the big-city TV stations that
covered the protest highlighted the “pornographic content”
and the idea of “local control,”
I saw the signs the protesters held. I know
what they really were protesting.
The idea that teens have sex.
Like it or not, teens will have sex.
Always have. Always will. Is this a good thing? A bad thing?
Like so much in life, it depends.
I don’t disagree with the idea that persons should not have sex if there’s
a chance of unwanted pregnancy, or potential of transmission of disease. I consider such individuals unknowledgeable
and unready to engage in what some refer to as “safe sex.” In cases such as these, no sex is better than
safe sex.
But you’ll note that I did not attach any age to such a condition.
Many “kids” aren’t ready. I can
also vouch that many adults are not, either, including many who ALREADY HAVE
KIDS. It’s not about age – it’s about
maturity. It’s also about knowledge,
which means education, which means “no quotes” around the word “education.”
Abstinence only “education” has been shown to be NOT
PRODUCTIVE. Over
and over
and over. Often the “education” is riddled with lies,
distortions, half-truths, and scare devices.
Kids need support, facts, caring.
It’s a difficult enough issue without the crap coming at you from the “just
say no” crowd.
In the fourteen years we’ve ran the ice cream parlor here,
we’ve hired more than 50 young women (OK, teen girls). I’ve lost a number to other jobs, college, and
fired a few as well.
And I’ve lost two because of pregnancy – one sixteen
year-old, and one fifteen-year old (who was impregnated by a thirteen year-old
boy). I learned (later) that the sixteen
year-old had the child, had another, married another man, and it seemed that
she got her life on track OK. So she
said. I never heard from the fifteen
year-old, but figured she’d wind up like her mom (many kids, different dads,
lather, rinse, repeat).
I can’t help but think that perhaps, with a little more
education and a lot less “education” things might have turned out differently. I don’t know.
I also would assume that these two are NOT the only ones who have had
sex while working here (just an assumption on my part based on stuff I hear is
all). And I could not say for certain
whether those who had sex and didn’t get pregnant had more or less education or
“education” that the other two.
But I can tell you that the time to get our heads out of the
sand and admit that kids need facts, not a waving finger (with a “no, no, no”
sneer). Abstinence only does not work
and should not be tried. Or funded.
Advocate self-discipline
and practice moderation, but above all promote education.
Quit fucking around with “Abstinence
Only pseudo-education.”
No comments:
Post a Comment